2 edition of Testimony and exhibit before the Arizona Corporation Commission found in the catalog.
Testimony and exhibit before the Arizona Corporation Commission
Leland L. Johnson
by Rand in Santa Monica, CA (P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica 90406)
Written in English
|Statement||Leland L. Johnson ; prepared for the Arizona Corporation Commission.|
|Series||A Rand note ;, N-2191-ACC|
|Contributions||Arizona Corporation Commission.|
|LC Classifications||HD9685.U6 A633 1984|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||96 p. :|
|Number of Pages||96|
|LC Control Number||85174028|
RESPONSIVE TESTIMONY OF BRIAN S PAGE 5 OF 37 CAUSE 1 Q HAVE YOU PREVIOUSLY FILED TESTIMONY BEFORE THE CORPORATION 2 COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA (“COMMISSION”) REGARDING 3 DEPRECIATION ISSUES? 4 A Yes. I filed testimony in OG&E’s last rate case, PUD , regarding OG&E’s 5 depreciation rates. In addition, I have filed depreciation related testimony. WHICH DR. ANKUM HAS FILED EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY Before the Arizona Corporation Commission Docket No. TB In the matter of the application of Qwest Corporation D/B/A CenturyLink QC (“CenturyLink”) to classify and regulate retail local exchange services as competitive, and to classify and.
BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION Arizona Corporation Commission DOCKETED JUL 31 7 8 9 COMMISSIONERS 10 l l 12 TOM FORESE, Chairman BOB BURNS ANDY TOBIN BOYD DUNN JUSTIN OLSON y DOCKET no. EA ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY'S NOTICE OF FILING DIRECT TESTIMONY ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, an Arizona . Arizona Corporation Commission W. Washington Phoenix, AZ Richard Gayer W. Wilshire Dr. Phoenix, AZ Jane Rodda Chief Administrative Law Judge Arizona Corporation Commission W. Washington Phoenix, AZ Warren Woodward Sierra Road Sedona, AZ c;t-Q_ Stacey Champion 1 North Central A venue Suite
TEP filed a rate application with the Arizona Corporation Commission (“Commission”) in Docket No. EA on November 5, The application was found to be sufficient on December 7, The rate case docket was subsequently consolidated with Docket No. EA ("TEP REST Plan docket") on April 6, 14 numerous water and wastewater utilities’ rate applications before the Arizona 15 Corporation Commission (“Commission”). A copy of my regulatory work experience is attached as Exhibit TJB-DT1. Q. ON WHOSE BEHALF ARE YOU TESTIFYING IN THIS PROCEEDING? 18 A. On behalf of EPCOR Water Arizona Inc. (“EWAZ” or the “Company.
Study guide for Oregon real estate law
All nature is groaning
Fire Behavior and Combustion Processes
Machines project pack.
Cracking the AP calculus AB & BC exams
Thirteenth report of session 2002-03
Sing, choirs of angels.
True Honor, Vol. 3
Education for journalism in the United States from its beginning to 1940.
Problems of the U.S. steel industry
Modern American painting from the Commerce Trust Company Collection.
Sangit acharya Master Chander
Testimony and Exhibit Before the Arizona Corporation Commission. by Leland Johnson. Related Topics: $ 20% Web Discount: This Note contains the full text of testimony presented before the Arizona Corporation Commission in an electricity rate proceeding involving the Arizona Public Service Company (APS), an investor-owned utility.
Additional Physical Format: Online version: Johnson, Leland L. Testimony and exhibit before the Arizona Corporation Commission.
Santa Monica, CA (P.O. BoxSanta Monica ):. before the arizona corporation commission in the matter of the commission’s investigation of value and cost of distributed generation. docket no. ej direct testimony and exhibits of briana kobor on behalf of vote solar febru As I explain more fully in my responsive testimony, CC&Ns are foundational to the ability of private water providers to provide safe and reliable service to customers in Arizona.
Any action by the Commission that has the potential to undermine the certainty of a CC&N issued to a single water and wastewater provider has the potential to. BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION. IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY FOR A HEARING TO DETERMINE THE FAIR VALUE OF THE UTILITY PROPERTY OF THE COMPANY FOR RATEMAKING PURPOSES, TO FIX A JUST AND REASONABLE RATE OF RETURN THEREON, TO APPROVE RATE SCHEDULES DESIGNED TO.
5 Regulatory Commission. 6 A copy of my current resume is attached as Exhibit DAS 7 II. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 8 Q. What is the purpose of your testimony. 9 A. I have been asked by the ACC Staff to examine whether the transfer and 10 separation of generating assets by the Arizona Public Service Company (“APS”).
Arizona Corporation Commission Public Hearing Information. The Company's direct testimony will be due, Responsive testimony from intervenors, including Commission Staff, will be due, Rebuttal testimony of the Company will be due, 1 before the arizona corporation commission 2 commissioners 3 mike gleason, chairman before the arzona corporation commission commissioners mike gleason, chairman jeff hatch-miller wilia a.
muell krstin k. mayes gary pierce 2 hereto as supplemental exhibit 1. before the arizona corporation commission in the matter of the application of uns electric, inc.
for the establishment of just and reasonable rates and charges designed to realize a reasonable rate of return on the fair value of the properties of uns electric, inc. devoted to its operations throughout the state of arizona and for related approvals.
Arizona Corporation Commissioners Burns and Olson Issue Draft Retail Electric Competition Rules. Commissioner Lea Márquez Peterson Appointed as Member of the NARUC Broadband Access Task Force. Commissioner Lea Márquez Peterson Leads Discussion on Performance Based Regulation in Utility Rate Cases.
February Open Meeting Highlights. Have you previously testified before the Arizona Corporation Commission 11 (the “Commission”). 12 A. Yes. I have provided testimony in Docket No. EA-l, the UNS 13 Electric, Inc. General Rate Case, and Docket No.
EJ, entitled “In 14 the Matter of the Commission’s Investigation of Value and Cost of Distributed. Mission: The Arizona Corporation Commission’s mission is to ensure safe, reliable, and affordable utility services; have railroad and pipeline systems that are operated and maintained in a safe manner; grow Arizona’s economy as we help local entrepreneurs achieve their dream of starting a business; modernize an efficient, effective, and responsive government agency; and protect Arizona.
Arizona Corporation Commission Docket No. TB RUCO Direct Testimony of Patrick J. Quinn Ma 12 1 A. Exhibit 3, the CenturyLink’s Revised Attachment A, shows the services that the CenturyLink is.
2 proposing to move and. BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION GARY PIERCE CHAIRMAN BOB STUMP COMMISSIONER SANDRA D. KENNEDY COMMISSIONER There was ample testimony in this case and in previous SW Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 are RUCO’s proposed amendments.
4 RUCO-6 at EXHIBIT 1. EXHIBIT 2. access rate was established in a subsequent docket, TC Attached to my testimony as Exhibit WRE-1 is a true and correct copy of the Commission’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order and Notice of Entry of Order dated Novem The Commission’s findings in TC analyzing the factors set forth in SDCL are.
Arizona Corporation Commission: 2/13/ Proposed Order from the Utilities Division: Steven M. Olea, Director - Utilities Division, A.C.C. Arizona Corporation Commission: 1/30/ Proposed Order from the Utilities Division: Steven M. Olea, Director - Utilities Division, A.C.C.
Arizona Corporation Commission: 1/30/ Compliance to a. before the arizona corporation commission commissioners tom forese, chairman bob burns doug little andy tobin boyd dunn in the matter of the application of rio verde utilities, inc., for approval of a rate increase for an increase in its water and wastewater rates for customers within maricopa county, arizona docket no.
wsa BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF OPERATIONS THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF ARIZONA AND FOR RELATED APPROVALS Docket No.
EA SURREBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF BRIANA KOBOR ON BEHALF OF VOTE SOLAR 19 you filed your direct testimony. 20 A. Yes. The Commission issued Decision.
before the arizona corporation commission gary pierce chairman bob stump commissioner sandra d. kennedy commissioner paul newman commissioner brenda burns commissioner in the matter of the application of litchfield park service company, an arizona corporation, for a determination of the fair value of its utility plants and.
for the presentation for telephonic testimony during the proceeding. On April 6,by Procedural Order, the Division’s motion to allow telephonic testimony was granted. On Apa full public hearing was commenced before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Phoenix, Arizona.
Respondents andFile Size: KB. Arizona Corporation Commission Docket No. TB RUCO Rebuttal Testimony of Patrick J. Quinn Ap 4 1 when CenturyLink provided the response to Staff’s Eighth Data Request. In subsequent testimony, Staff 2 returned to their original position of non compliance regarding Condition Three.9 oral testimony before public utility commissions in the states of Alaska, Arizona, 10 Arkansas, Colorado, Massachusetts, Nevada, Oklahoma, Texas and Utah, and written 11 testimony in the state of Florida.Arizona Corporation Commission, the Staff of the Kansas State Corporation A copy of my current resume is attached as Exhibit___DAS Q.
Have you previously submitted testimony before this Commission? A. Yes. I submitted testimony in September in Public Service Commission of Wisconsin (“Commission”) Docket Nos.